I know you are......but what am I
mermaid2884
read my profile
sign my guestbook

Visit mermaid2884's Xanga Site!

Name: Cassandra
Birthday: 2/8/1984
Gender: Female


Interests: God, Shaun, Crystal, teaching, reading, talking, watching movies, singing, listening to music, making funny videos
Expertise: being goofy, quoting movies, eating pizza, napping, showering affection upon my beloved husband
Occupation: Student, intern, wife...3 full
Industry: Education, Domestication


Message: message me
Website: visit my website
AIM: mermaid42703


Member Since: 12/9/2003

SubscriptionsSites I Read
DaddysgirlRobby
jesuslovesmetoo
zeteosophia
passthetacos
kiddenkat
tropicanagirl
christianary2
THEcaffinator
Lollie20
ThruTheEyesOfVu
Kandi_Girl727
skteelvley
IseeWonder
real_live_hobbits
MayfieldCow
Zachatello00
Drewjune06
beckdork
firedup44Christ
LBo1984
bluboxblues
waynuswagnus
Christman16
purplemumx4
UrielSpears
tophertfm
Pretty_In_Pink212
kristinmackenzie
JesseStu
BlueEyedLovely
JesusMyLove
DayDreamStar
doubleofive
imajedi4

Blogrings
JBC Kids
previous - random - next

Chicken is Awesome Oppossum!
previous - random - next


Posting Calendar

|<< oldest | newest >>|
view all weblog archives

Get Involved!

Suggest a link

Recommend to friend

Create a site


Wednesday, March 05, 2008

...yeah

I've pretty much moved permanently over to blogger (www.blogspot.com/mermaid2884) I think I'll keep xanga up just to post on other people's blogs. Love ya!


Saturday, December 15, 2007

Providence and Politics

Last week, a Liberty University student asked Gov. Mike Huckabee to account for his recent surge in the polls. "There's only one explanation for it, and it is not a human one," Huckabee claimed, "It is the same power that helped a little boy with two fishes and five loaves feed a crowd of 5,000 people. And that's the only way our campaign could be doing what it is doing." In other words, God apparently wants Mike Huckabee to be president—or, at the very least, win the Iowa caucuses. And, evidently, Mike Huckabee wants evangelical Christians to think that God has uniquely chosen him for office, as many believed God chose George W. Bush.

There is good reason for Christians to take theological offense at these claims—and that would be upon the basis the doctrine of providence. Very generally, providence is the idea that God orders human events that enacts God's will for the universe. In popular American religion, as Gov. Huckabee articulated, providence often becomes God's direct intervention in specific historical acts. I once heard George Marsden, the eminent evangelical historian with whom I studied in graduate school, refer to this version of providence as "the finger of God" directing human events.

But finger-of-God explanations are dangerous in relation to politics. If God is the power behind a candidate, then, if that candidate wins, he or she is both beyond reproach and immune to criticism—because, of course, that person is seen as divinely appointed or anointed. The politician's actions are synonymous with God's will. This opens the door for political silliness (God desires tax cuts) or hubris (God favors our political party)—as well as making God responsible for a host of reprehensible or potentially evil acts in the forms of injustice, oppression, or war.

Of course, western Christians once believed in finger-of-God politics—during the Middle Ages in the doctrinal form of the divine right of kings. This doctrine was eventually challenged from within Christian theology itself, when the Puritans argued that divine right had to be balanced with reason and responsibility within the body politic. Although the Puritans did not always practice what they preached, their tradition—as articulated by John Locke—undermined supernatural pretensions to rule. Locke's rejection of the divine right of kings was one pillar of the revolutionary republican politics upon which the U.S. was founded.

But rejecting "finger of God" theories of providence does not necessarily make one a secularist. It is possible to recognize providence in politics, while leaving room for nuance, humility, and mystery. Instead of seeing God as causing specific actions, it seems preferable to understand providence as the unfolding of God's story through time—a tale of sin, reconciliation, justice, and peace from creation to the end of history, of which God shares with us the narrative trajectories, not the specific twists of plot.

In this story, God does not control human actions as a divine puppet master. Rather, as human beings encounter the story, we change and our actions begin to conform to God's narrative of shalom. In this way, God's intentions unfold as we practice faith in humble gratitude that God has invited us into the story. Providence is not divine Mapquest or supernatural tom-tom. Rather, providence is a pilgrimage of God's people in time as they seek to live in mercy, kindness, and grace—and that is where God's will is made known. Not God's finger, providence is the breath of God, the spirit enlivening human beings to do justice.

Any number of the current candidates, Republican and Democrat, offer visions of how they understand their lives in relationship to an unfolding story of God's justice. But no one candidate should or can claim God's anointing on his or her campaign. If nothing else, American Christians might look at the last eight years as an example of the folly of finger-of-God politics.

Diana Butler Bass


Thursday, October 18, 2007

Currently Watching
Bobby (Widescreen Edtion)
By Demi Moore, Anthony Hopkins, Lawrence Fishburne, Lindsay Lohan, Elijah Wood
see related

The Other Kennedy

Last night, Shaun and I watched the movie "Bobby" which depicted the assassination of presidential candidate, Robert F. Kennedy.  It was really interesting for me to watch since I really didn't know much about "the other Kennedy".  I can't really say the film was that spectacular...the plot was sort of choppy and didn't really lead you anywhere.  But there were some great clips of real news coverage of his candidacy and speeches.  The speech given at the very end by Bobby was particularly moving to me.  I would encourage you to read it, when you have the time.

Speech by Robert F. Kennedy - Cleveland City Club, Cleveland Ohio  - April 5, 1968

This is a time of shame and sorrow. It is not a day for politics. I have saved this one opportunity, my only event of today, to speak briefly to you about the mindless menace of violence in America which again stains our land and every one of our lives.

It is not the concern of any one race. The victims of the violence are black and white, rich and poor, young and old, famous and unknown. They are, most important of all, human beings whom other human beings loved and needed. No one - no matter where he lives or what he does - can be certain who will suffer from some senseless act of bloodshed. And yet it goes on and on and on in this country of ours.

Why? What has violence ever accomplished? What has it ever created? No martyr's cause has ever been stilled by an assassin's bullet.

No wrongs have ever been righted by riots and civil disorders. A sniper is only a coward, not a hero; and an uncontrolled, uncontrollable mob is only the voice of madness, not the voice of reason.

Whenever any American's life is taken by another American unnecessarily - whether it is done in the name of the law or in the defiance of the law, by one man or a gang, in cold blood or in passion, in an attack of violence or in response to violence - whenever we tear at the fabric of the life which another man has painfully and clumsily woven for himself and his children, the whole nation is degraded.

"Among free men," said Abraham Lincoln, "there can be no successful appeal from the ballot to the bullet; and those who take such appeal are sure to lose their cause and pay the costs."

Yet we seemingly tolerate a rising level of violence that ignores our common humanity and our claims to civilization alike. We calmly accept newspaper reports of civilian slaughter in far-off lands. We glorify killing on movie and television screens and call it entertainment. We make it easy for men of all shades of sanity to acquire whatever weapons and ammunition they desire.

Too often we honor swagger and bluster and wielders of force; too often we excuse those who are willing to build their own lives on the shattered dreams of others. Some Americans who preach non-violence abroad fail to practice it here at home. Some who accuse others of inciting riots have by their own conduct invited them.

Some look for scapegoats, others look for conspiracies, but this much is clear: violence breeds violence, repression brings retaliation, and only a cleansing of our whole society can remove this sickness from our soul.

For there is another kind of violence, slower but just as deadly destructive as the shot or the bomb in the night. This is the violence of institutions; indifference and inaction and slow decay. This is the violence that afflicts the poor, that poisons relations between men because their skin has different colors. This is the slow destruction of a child by hunger, and schools without books and homes without heat in the winter.

This is the breaking of a man's spirit by denying him the chance to stand as a father and as a man among other men. And this too afflicts us all.

I have not come here to propose a set of specific remedies nor is there a single set. For a broad and adequate outline we know what must be done. When you teach a man to hate and fear his brother, when you teach that he is a lesser man because of his color or his beliefs or the policies he pursues, when you teach that those who differ from you threaten your freedom or your job or your family, then you also learn to confront others not as fellow citizens but as enemies, to be met not with cooperation but with conquest; to be subjugated and mastered.

We learn, at the last, to look at our brothers as aliens, men with whom we share a city, but not a community; men bound to us in common dwelling, but not in common effort. We learn to share only a common fear, only a common desire to retreat from each other, only a common impulse to meet disagreement with force. For all this, there are no final answers.

Yet we know what we must do. It is to achieve true justice among our fellow citizens. The question is not what programs we should seek to enact. The question is whether we can find in our own midst and in our own hearts that leadership of humane purpose that will recognize the terrible truths of our existence.

We must admit the vanity of our false distinctions among men and learn to find our own advancement in the search for the advancement of others. We must admit in ourselves that our own children's future cannot be built on the misfortunes of others. We must recognize that this short life can neither be ennobled or enriched by hatred or revenge.

Our lives on this planet are too short and the work to be done too great to let this spirit flourish any longer in our land. Of course we cannot vanquish it with a program, nor with a resolution.

But we can perhaps remember, if only for a time, that those who live with us are our brothers, that they share with us the same short moment of life; that they seek, as do we, nothing but the chance to live out their lives in purpose and in happiness, winning what satisfaction and fulfillment they can.

Surely, this bond of common faith, this bond of common goal, can begin to teach us something. Surely, we can learn, at least, to look at those around us as fellow men, and surely we can begin to work a little harder to bind up the wounds among us and to become in our own hearts brothers and countrymen once again.


Saturday, July 21, 2007

Currently Reading
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (Book 7)
By J. K. Rowling
see related
....that is all.


Monday, May 07, 2007

Starbucks at JBC?!

Well I had heard the rumor and now it is confirmed. I have heard straight from the mouth of Dr. Weedman that he is, indeed, trying to see what he can do about turning the JBC River Grill into a Starbucks. He told us this morning at our internship meeting. He said he had done it at the last school he was out and it worked out really well for everyone. The students loved it and the college made a lot of money off of it. So we shall see. My only sadness lies in the fact that I will not be a student here any longer to enjoy the amazing benefits of having a STARBUCKS ON CAMPUS!!!!



Next 5 >>